Disciplinary Procedures

- Right to receive a written notice of the alleged DOR conduct violation;
- Right to a DOR student conduct hearing;
- Right to be present at the hearing;
- Right to present documentary, testimonial or physical evidence at the hearing;
- Right to remain silent during the hearing;
- Right to have an advisor/support person present at the hearing;
- Right to receive notice of the DOR conduct decision within five (5) business days after a final decision has been determined; and
- Right to appeal a final decision.
- Warning: A written notice indicating that a violation occurred, and a more severe sanction will occur if the conduct does not change.
- Disciplinary Reprimand: A written rebuke telling the student that their conduct is in violation of Residence rules and regulations.
- Probation: A more severe sanction than a disciplinary reprimand. Probation is a period of review during which the student or student organization must demonstrate the ability to comply with Residence rules, regulations and other requirements stipulated for the probation period.
- Education: A requirement to participate in some project, class or other activity that is relevant to the nature of the offense and appropriate for the violation.
- Restitution: A requirement to pay the cost of cleaning, repair and/or replacement of property damage incurred during the conduct violation, to another student or the DOR.
- Deferred Removal: A more severe sanction than Probation. Deferred removal is a period of review during which the occurrence of another violation will result in cancellation of the student’s residence contract.
- Termination of Housing Contract: A student may be removed from a residence hall or apartment. The student’s access to specific living or dining areas may be restricted as part of the sanction.
- Harassment, including verbal or physical assault/abuse
- Conduct that threatens or endangers the health and safety of others
- Possession of firearms in DOR facilities or in violation of ISU policy
- Arson, tampering with the fire alarm system
- Possession, selling, manufacturing of drugs in DOR facilities or in violation of ISU policy
- Substantial procedural error that materially affected the outcome;
- The decision was arbitrary and capricious or constituted an abuse of discretion;
- There is new evidence presented that was not reasonably available at the time of the hearing and is relevant to establishing whether it is more likely than not the respondent is responsible for the violation; and/or
- The sanctions imposed are outside the Department of Residence’s sanction range for such violations and/or not justified in light of the totality of the circumstances.
- Grounds for appeal;
- Examination of and references to evidence presented during the hearing;
- New evidence – If the appeal is based on new evidence, the written statement should contain a statement detailing the new evidence, together with a statement as to why the information was not reasonably available at the time of the hearing and how the new evidence impacts the matter.